5/28/2025
1. A Violent attack on Congress (January 6, 2021) after Trump’s “Stop the Steal” political rally at the Ellipse, instigated by a sitting President of the United States.
Prove it.
Okey.
SUPPLEMENTAL STATEMENT OF FACTS and EVIDENCE
SOURCING
The following facts, derived from admissible evidence which include aggregated evidentiary support from The Congressional Publishing Office’s JANUARY 6th SELECT COMMITTEE REPORT (“CPO J6 REPORT”), sworn testimony, authenticated body cam and security video footage on the day (sourced from the CPO J6 Report), printed accounts in magazines such as ProPublica, AP, The Hill, Washington Examiner, and The Atlantic as well as books, social media, and other summaries on the docket thereof under FRE 1006.
STATEMENT OF FACTS
1. A Violent attack on Congress (January 6, 2021) after Trump’s “Stop the Steal” political rally at the ellipses, instigated by a sitting President of the United States.
As Evidenced and confirmed by:
Digital video digest:
- Audio of Captiol Police Radio in Digital Video Digest, people spotted with AR-15 type of weapons, and various handguns
- “I got 3 men walking down the street in fatigues carrying AR-15 style weapons” – Police radio 00:16:00 Video Digest Exhibit
- “an individual who is in a tree, gonna be a white male about six feet tall, thin build, brown cowboy boots, he’s got a bluejean jacked and underneath the blue jean jacket complainants saw stock of an AR-15 he’s gonna be with a group of individuals about 5 to 8 other individuals, two of the individuals at the base of the tree at the porta potties were wearing green fatigues, green olive dress style fatigues, about 5’8 5;9”. Skinny white males brown cowboy boots, they had Glock Style Pistols in their waistbands” – Police radio 00:15:55 Video Digest Exhibit
- “My friends had blood on their face, I was slipping on their blood” (Digital Video Digest, officer testimony 00:12:37)
- “I was about to pass out from lack of oxygen” officer testimony Digital Video Digest Exhibit
(Important to action watch this)- “they’re trying to fucking kill me!!” [kevin mccarthy]
“Well Kevin, I guess they’re upset about a stolen election” [DJT]
(The Hill – Oct 11, 2022 - “McCarthy told Trump that Jan. 6 rioters were ‘trying to f—— kill me’: book” by Emily Brooks)- Evidence developed in the Committee’s investigation showed that the President, when told that the crowd was chanting “Hang Mike Pence,” responded that perhaps the Vice President deserved to be hanged.642 And President Trump rebuffed pleas from Leader McCarthy to ask that his supporters leave the Capitol stating, “Well, Kevin, I guess these people are more upset about the election than you are.” (CPO J6 REPORT pp.111)
- Rep. Jaime Herrera Beutler [testimony] (R–WA), to whom McCarthy spoke soon after, relayed more of the conversation between McCarthy and President Trump:
And he said [to President Trump], “You have got to get on TV. You’ve got to get on Twitter. You’ve got to call these people off.” You know what the President said to him? This is as it’s happening. He said, “Well Kevin, these aren’t my people. You know, these are Antifa. And Kevin responded and said, “No, they’re your people. They literally just came through my office windows and my staff are running for cover. I mean they’re running for their lives. You need to call them off.” And the President’s response to Kevin to me was chilling. He said, “Well Kevin, I guess they’re just more upset about the election, you know, theft than you are”
(CPO J6 REPORT pp. 84)
2. Trump incited the attack on Congress to stop certification of the 2020 election, as confirmed by:
- “
Jeremy Bertino, the Proud Boys leader who was stabbed on the night of December 12th, later told authorities that his fellow extremists plotted to stop the peaceful transfer of power. In October 2022, Bertino pleaded guilty to “seditious conspiracy” and other crimes.
Bertino admitted that the Proud Boys traveled to Washington, DC on January 6, 2021, “to stop the certification of the Electoral College Vote.” They “were willing to do whatever it would take, including using force against police and others, to achieve that objective.”
“
(CPO J6 REPORT pp. 512)
- Admissions that they did it for Trump in court records (Exhibit: Alter v. Trump FRE 1006 Felons for Trump);
- “States want to correct their votes, which they now know were based on irregularities and fraud, plus corrupt process never received legislative approval. All Mike Pence has to do is send them back to the States, AND WE WIN. Do it Mike, this is a time for extreme courage” Donald Trump Tweet, Jan 6, 8:17 AM, CPO J6 REPORT pp. 35
- Trump still speaking to crowd at 12:06 “I hope mike is going to do the right thing”..”because if mike Pense does the right thing, we win the election” “if he doesn’t that will be a sad day for our country because you’ll never take our country back with weakness, you have to show strength and you have to be strong” Digital Video Exhibit 00:02:49-00:03:30
- Seditious conspiracy convictions of Stop The Steal attendees (Exhibit Alter v. Trump FRE 1006 Seditious Conspiracy court records);
3. The reasonable conclusion of that The President obstructed transfer of power:
- And then the President made his demand. “So look. All I want to do is this. I just want to find 11,780 votes, which is one more than we have,” President Trump told Raffensperger.7 “ (CPO J6 Report P. 263, also recorded audio)
- “And what Trump’s going to do is declare victory, right? He’s going to declare victory, but that doesn’t mean he’s a winner. He’s just gonna say he’s a winner. The Democrats – more of our people vote early that count. Theirs vote to mail. And so they’re going to have a natural disadvantage and Turmp’s going to take advantage – that’s our strategy.” Steve Bannon (in leaked audio recording presented in J6 Select Committee and transcribed on page 576 in the CPO J6 Report)
-
- “I really do suspect it will still be up in the air. When that happens, the key thing to do is to claim victory. Possession is nine-tenths of the law. No, we won. Fuck you, Sorry. Over. We won. You’re wrong. Fuck you.” – Roger Stone (CPO J6 REPORT pp.11)
- “
President Trump also attempted to use the Department of Justice (DOJ) for his own corrupt political purposes. President Trump offered the job of Acting Attorney General to a loyalist. He wanted this same DOJ official, Jeffrey Clark, to send a letter to several States suggesting that they should certify the fake electors convened by the Trump Campaign. President
Trump’s effort to subvert the DOJ came to a head on January 3rd, when the Department’s senior personnel and lawyers in the White House Counsel’
Office threatened mass resignations if Clark was installed.
“ CPO REPORT pp. 427
- “
More than 30 witnesses before the Select Committee exercised their Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination and refused on that basis to provide testimony. They included individuals central to the investigation,
such as John Eastman, Jeffrey Clark, Roger Stone, Michael Flynn, Kenneth Chesebro, and others. The law allows a civil litigant to rely upon an “adverse inference” when a witness invokes the Fifth Amendment. “[T]he Fifth Amendment does not forbid adverse inferences against parties to civil
actions . . ..” The Committee has not chosen to rely on any such inference in this Report or in its hearings.
We do note that certain witness assertions of the Fifth Amendment were particularly troubling, including this:
Vice Chair Cheney: General Flynn, do you believe the violence on January 6th was justified?
Counsel for the Witness: Can I get clarification, is that a moral
question or are you asking a legal question?
Vice Chair Cheney: I'm asking both.
General Flynn: The Fifth.
Vice Chair Cheney: Do you believe the violence on January 6th was justified morally?
General Flynn: Take the Fifth.
Vice Chair Cheney: Do you believe the violence on January 6th was justified legally?
General Flynn: Fifth.
Vice Chair Cheney: General Flynn, do you believe in the peaceful transition of power in the United States of America?
General Flynn: The Fifth.
President Trump refused to comply with the Committee’s subpoena, and also filed suit to block the National Archives from supplying the Committee with White House records. The Committee litigated the National Archives case in Federal District Court, in the Federal Appellate Court for the District of Columbia, and before the Supreme Court. The Select Committee
was successful in this litigation. The opinion of the D.C. Circuit explained:
On January 6, 2021, a mob professing support for then-President Trump violently attacked the United States Capitol in an effort to prevent a Joint Session of Congress from certifying the electoral college votes designating Joseph R. Biden the 46th President of the United States. The rampage left multiple people dead, injured more than 140 people, and inflicted millions of dollars in damage to the Capitol. Then-Vice President Pence, Senators, and Representatives were all forced to halt their constitutional duties and flee the House and Senate chambers for safety.
Several other witnesses have also avoided testifying in whole or in part by asserting Executive Privilege or Absolute Immunity from any obligation to appear before Congress. For example, the President’s Chief of Staff Mark Meadows invoked both, and categorically refused to testify, even about text messages he provided to the Committee. The House of Representatives voted to hold him in criminal contempt.”
(CPO J6 REPORT pp. 118-119)
4. President Trump was credibly informed that the information he was disseminating about a stolen election were false as evidenced by sworn testimony:
- “The President raised, among others, debunked claims about voting machines in Michigan, a truck driver who allegedly moved ballots from New York to Pennsylvania, and a purported election fraud at the State Farm Arena in Georgia.None of the allegations were credible, and Rosen and Donoghue said so to the President.” ..
Donoghue recorded in handwritten notes a request President Trump made specifically to him and Acting Attorney General Rosen: “Just say the election was corrupt and leave the rest to me and the Republican Congressmen.”
Donoghue explained: “[T]he Department had zero involvement in anyone’s political strategy,” and “he wanted us to say that it was corrupt.”
“We told him we were not going to do that.”
At the time, neither Rosen nor Donoghue knew the full extent to which Republican Congressmen, including Representative Scott Perry, were attempting to assist President Trump to overturn the election results. The Committee’s investigation has shown that Congressman Perry was working with one Department of Justice official, Jeffrey Clark, regarding the stolen election claims. Perry was working with Clark and with President Trump and Chief of Staff Mark Meadows with this goal: to enlist Clark to reverse the Department of Justice’s findings regarding the election and help overturn the election outcome.277”
CPO J6 REPORT p49
5. Trump’s 187-minute delay in deploying the National Guard was deliberate and Trump did nothing to stop it during that time as evidenced by sworn testimony:
-
(CPO J6 REPORT pp. 578)
6. Trump’s deceptions about a stolen election pre-dated the election and were intentional strategy as evidenced by :
- “And what Trump’s going to do is declare victory, right? He’s going to declare victory, but that doesn’t mean he’s a winner. He’s just gonna say he’s a winner. The Democrats – more of our people vote early that count. Theirs vote to mail. And so they’re going to have a natural disadvantage and Turmp’s going to take advantage – that’s our strategy. He’s gonna declare himself a winner. So when you wake up Wednessday morning, it’s going to be a firestorm. Also- also if Trump is – if Trump is losing by 10 or 11 at night, it’s going to be even crazier. Because he’s gonna sit right there and say they stole it. If Biden’s winning, Trump is going to do some crazy shit.”
Steve Bannon (in leaked audio recording presented in J6 Select Committee and transcribed on page 576 in the CPO J6 Report
- Bill Barr cont. intercut “I told him [president] that the stuff his people were shoveling out to the public were bullshit. I mean that the claims of fraud are bullshit” “I saw zero evidence for the claims, but they were made in such a sensational way that they were obviously influencing the public that there’s a systemic corruption in the system and that their votes didn’t count” 00:13:00 Video Digest Exhibit
- Eric Herschman Former White House Lawyer testimony “I never saw any evidence whatsoever to sustain those [dominion voting machines] allegations” 00:14:22 Video Digest Exhibit
- Trump speaking to crowd intercut “The only way we’re going to lose this election, is if the election is rigged” 00:13:11
7. Trump’s Presidential Proclamation of commutation and Pardon for J6 participants within minutes of inauguration on January 20, 2025(Alter v Trump Presidential Proclamation in Exhibits). Does not exonerate them, express remorse for their acts, or provide any condemnation of them, or granular analysis of their individual merit for such. A number of them were convicted for Seditious Conspiracy. Evidenced by court records and admissions, they did it for Trump:
- "We were invited by the President" (Facebook post)
"Trump called us to do this!" (Bodycam footage)
"Trump said it was our duty" (Post-arrest statement)
Seditious conspiracy convictions of Stop The Steal attendees (Exhibit Alter v. Trump FRE 1006 Seditious Conspiracy court records);
8. Pardoned J6 Felons threaten and FBI agents and prosecutors, Trump did not even consider what unleashing 1500 of them from jail with blanket pardons/commutations would unleash on the public, or the merits of their prosecutions, they were his people, he wasn’t interested. As evidenced by:
- “I’ve spent my career prosecuting violent criminals, transnational organized crime, violent crimes, firearms offenses, trafficking offences,” said one former prosecutor, who spent years prosecuting Jan. 6 cases, “never have I felt less safe than with these defendants”
Source Exhibit – Pardoned J6 Felons threaten FBI agents and prosecutors.
- “There’s no indication that he engaged in any kind of assessment or has even stopped to think, ‘What did I just unleash on America?’” Mary McCord, a former federal prosecutor who oversaw domestic terrorism cases as a senior Justice Department official, said of Trump’s actions. Colin Clarke, an analyst at the nonpartisan security-focused Soufan Center, said “far right” and “domestic terrorism” are now “kind of dirty words with the current administration.”
Source Politico: Trump’s Pardons and Purges Revive Old Question: Who Counts as a Terrorist? by Hannah Allam, Feb 10, 2025
-
9. The president persistently used coercion and the power of his office to reject factual findings, and tried to cajole officials to attest to as evidenced by sworn testimony:
- Donoghue recorded in handwritten notes a request President Trump made specifically to him and Acting Attorney General Rosen: “Just say the election was corrupt and leave the rest to me and the Republican Congressmen.” 274 Donoghue explained: “[T]he Department had zero involvement in anyone’s political strategy,” and “he wanted us to say that it was corrupt.” “We told him we were not going to do that.” At the time, neither Rosen nor Donoghue knew the full extent to which Republican Congressmen, including Representative Scott Perry, were attempting to assist President Trump to overturn the election results.
The Committee’s investigation has shown that Congressman Perry was working with one Department of Justice official, Jeffrey Clark, regarding the stolen election claims. Perry was working with Clark and with President Trump and Chief of Staff Mark Meadows with this goal: to enlist Clark to reverse the Department of Justice’s findings regarding the election and help overturn the election outcome.”
(CPO J6 REPORT p49)
- Likewise, Eric Herschmann, another White House lawyer, expressed the same understanding that Eastman’s plan “obviously made no sense” and “had no practical ability to work.” Herschmann also recounted telling Eastman directly that his plan was “completely crazy”:
“And I said to [Eastman], hold on a second, I want to understand what you’re saying. You’re saying you believe the Vice President, acting as President of the Senate, can be the sole decisionmaker as to, under your theory, who becomes the next President of the United States? And he said, yes. And I said, are you out of your F’ing mind, right. And that was pretty blunt. I said, you’re completely crazy. “
(CPO J6 REPORT pp. 34-35)
10. At exactly 2:24 p.m., President Trump made his first public statement during the attack on the Capitol by tweet. It read nothing like the statement his advisors had envisioned. Pat Cipollone had drafted the “stay peaceful” note, but this is what Donald Trump tweeted :
“Mike Pence didn’t have the courage to do what should have been done to protect our Country and our Constitution, giving States a chance to certify a corrected set of facts, not the fraudulent or inaccurate ones which they were asked to previously certify. USA demands the truth!”
As evidenced by :
-“
At exactly 2:24 p.m., President Trump made his first public statement during the attack on the Capitol by tweet. It read nothing like the statement his advisors had envisioned. It read:
“Mike Pence didn’t have the courage to do what should have been done to protect our Country and our Constitution, giving States a chance to certify a corrected set of facts, not the fraudulent or inaccurate ones which they were asked to previously certify. USA demands the truth!”
Minutes later, Meadows and Cipollone returned from their talk with the President.
No statement was forthcoming.
“Mark, we need to do something more. They’re literally calling for the Vice President to be [fucking] hung,” Hutchinson heard Cipollone say. “You heard him, Pat,” Meadows replied. “He thinks Mike deserves it. He doesn’t think they’re doing anything wrong.”
“This is [fucking] crazy. We need to be doing something more,” Cipollone said. Cipollone told the Select Committee that “there needed to be an immediate and forceful response, statement, public statement, that people need to leave the Capitol now.” He said he was “pretty clear” about his view in the White House that day, and he made that view known as soon as he became aware of the unrest. He would not comment on how the President responded, or on this conversation with Meadows, citing executive privilege. He did indicate that everyone in the White House—except President Trump—agreed that people needed to leave the Capitol:
Vice Chair Cheney: And who on the staff did not want people to leave the Capitol?
Mr. Cipollone: On the staff?
Vice Chair Cheney: In the White House.
Mr. Cipollone: I can’t think of anybody on that day who didn’t want people to get out of the Capitol once the—particularly once the violence started. No. I mean—
Mr. Schiff: What about the President?
Vice Chair Cheney: Yeah.
Mr. Cipollone: Well, she said the staff. So I answered.
Vice Chair Cheney: No. I said in the White House.
“ (CPO Report J6 Select Committee pp 596-597 )
11. A protester read the angry Pence tweet out to the angry mob with a bullhorn as evidenced by :
- 2:24pm Rioter with bullhorn reads Trump tweet to crowd “Mike Pence didn’t have the courage to do what should have been done to protect our country and our constitution”
“hang mike pence”
Rioters entering capitol “who’s house, our house”
Crypt breached at 2:25pm
(see Video Digest Exhibit and timecode index 00:05:47-00:12:37)
12. President Trump had all this advice to the contrary but nonetheless applied every bit of direct pressure to Mike Pence to send the count back to the states. None of this was a question of policy our administrating the country, it was all about an election result that he was determined to change after losing, using any means possible.
- “
President Trump tried to reach the Vice President early in the morning of January 6th, but the Vice President did not take the call. The President finally reached the Vice President later that morning, shouting from the Oval Office to his assistants to “get the Vice President on the phone.” After again telling the Vice President that he had “the legal authority to send [electoral votes] back to the respective states,” President Trump grew very heated. Witnesses in the Oval Office during this call told the Select Committee that the President called Vice President Pence a“wimp,” told him it would be “a political career killer” to certify the lawful electoral votes electing President Biden,182 and accused him of “not [being] tough enough to make the call.” As Ivanka Trump would recount to her chief of staff moments later, her father called the Vice President “the p-word” for
refusing to overturn the election.
“
CPO J6 REPORT pp. 35
13. It was reported that President Trump did not write the 2 tweets that urged peaceful protest after the Mike Pense tweet, they were drafted by Mike Scavino who advised him to send it after his inflammatory tweet about Mike Pence.
As evidenced by :
- “
As the Capitol breach unfolded, a small group of people around Trump, including Scavino, tried to persuade him to send a forceful message to the protesters, sources told ABC News. Instead, after about 20 minutes of urging, Scavino and others left Trump alone in the White House dining room, which is when Trump posted a tweet disparaging Vice President Mike Pence for not having "the courage to do what should have been done to protect our Country," the sources said. 2/4 They told ABC News that the tweet shocked several aides, including Scavino, the only other person with access to Trump's Twitter account. Trump's aides and White House counsel Pat Cipollone once again tried to urge Trump to send a strong message to the protesters, the sources said. Scavino then printed out several tweets to propose to Trump, sources told the outlet.
”
(Business Insider report ‘Trump didn't even write his tweet urging January 6 protesters to remain 'peaceful’: report By Lloyd Lee. Jan 7, 2024)
14. The 2 tweets urging rioters to “stay peaceful”, are debunked in The Special Counsel’s Report Part 1, in which he points out that they were already quite unpeaceful when that was tweeted. They were not urging rioters to stop, or leave, as his advisors were urging, but to continue what they were doing. They were followed by more tweets attacking Mike Pence reiterating false claims and using the word “we” to collectively refer to the protestors in solidarity of what they were doing for Trump, as he watched on television. (source Special Counsel Report Part 1 pp-28-32 - Exhibits)[1]
15. The RNC knew president trump was lying to the American people, as evidenced by:
- “RNC leadership knew that President Trump was lying to the American people. Yet, they did nothing to publicly distance themselves from his efforts to overturn the election. The RNC’s response was merely to tinker around the edges of the fundraising copy but never to fundamentally challenge the one message that remained present in TMAGAC’s post-election fundraising copy—President Trump’s Big Lie.”
Pp 780 CPO J6 REPORT Exhibit, APPENDIX 3 FOLLOW THE MONEY
16. President Trump has subsequently used executive orders and the power of his office to target private citizens, public servants who investigated j6 crimes, and law firms who hired them, as evidenced by:
- Exhibit Perkins Coui – TRO and later INJUNCTION court order
17. What Donald Trump wanted Mike Pence to do on January 6, was seditious in nature, it aimed to upend Democracy through the use of force, fraud, and intimidation. His 2nd term, is an unapologetic continuation of these aims and he uses the power of his office toward these aims, and other aims which have little at all to do with public service and are more like support of his (and allies) efforts towards revenge, self-enrichment, political gain, or illegal acts covering up his culpability for other illegal/unconstitutional and/or seditious acts including J6. Put simply, because of Trump’s misuse of power and his pervasive fraud, and support of it, the entire administration is crooked from head-to-toe and certainly none of those things is part of fulfilling his duties as president or a lawful use of his office. It calls the legitimacy of the entire apparatus of government into question for any rational observer. Every assertion of fact from this administration, every characterization, comes with a wink and a healthy dose of objection or public abuse if they are not believed which defies all credulity. It is a shock to the conscience and a daily avalanche of defamation of the American People who get in his way, observed daily/hourly which cannot be escaped, contested, or muted in any meaningful way which has a meaningful and ongoing chilling effect on constitutional principles and citizens willing to speak out against violations of law.
As confirmed by :
As confirmed by sworn testimony :
- “That declaration of Donald Trump as the next president would have plunged America into what I believe would have been tantamount to a revolution within a constitutional crisis in America, which in my view, and I’m only one man, would have been the first constitutional crisis since the founding of the republic,” – testimony given before the committee from renowned conservative former judge Michael J. Luttig (audio is at the head of Video Digest Exhibit)
- “Thus far, Trump’s presidency has been a reign of lawless aggression by a tyrannical wannabe king, a rampage of presidential lawlessness in which Trump has proudly wielded the powers of the office and the federal government to persecute his enemies, while at the same time pardoning, glorifying, and favoring his political allies and friends—among them those who attacked the U.S. Capitol during the insurrection that Trump fomented on January 6, 2021. The president’s utter contempt for the Constitution and laws of the United States has been on spectacular display since Inauguration Day.”
…
For not one of his signature initiatives during his first 100 days in office does Trump have the authority under the Constitution and laws of the United States that he claims. Not for the crippling global tariffs he ordered unilaterally; not for his unlawful deportations of hundreds of immigrants to the Terrorism Confinement Center (CECOT), El Salvador’s squalid maximum-security prison; not for his deportation of U.S. citizens to Honduras; not for his defiantly corrupt order from the Great Hall of the Department of Justice to weaponize the department against his political enemies; not for his evil executive orders against the nation’s law firms for their representation of his political enemies and clients of whom he personally disapproves; not for his corrupt executive orders against honorable American citizens and former officials of his own administration, Chris Krebs and Miles Taylor, a former Homeland Security chief of staff who dared to criticize Trump anonymously during his first term; not for his unlawful bludgeoning of the nation’s colleges and universities with unconstitutional demands that they surrender their governance and curricula to his wholly owned federal government; not for his threatened revocation of Harvard University’s tax-exempt status; not for his impoundment of billions of dollars of congressionally approved funds or his politically motivated threats to revoke tax exemptions; not for his attempt to alter the rules for federal elections; not for his direct assault on the Fourteenth Amendment’s birthright-citizenship guarantee; not for his mass firings of federal employees; not for his empowerment of Musk and DOGE to ravage the federal government; not for his threats to fire Federal Reserve Board Chairman Jerome Powell; not for his unconstitutional attacks on press freedoms; and finally, not for his appalling arrest of Judge Dugan.”
“
Excerpts Source for Op Ed for The Atlantic on May 14, 2025, by former judge Michael J Luttig- “The Trump administration cited “performance” failures to justify its mass firing of IRS workers. But this claim was “false,” a senior agency attorney warned officials, because the administration had not conducted any such performance assessment. “ (ProPublica – Mar 19, 2025, “Emails Reveal Top IRS Lawyer Warned Trump Firings Were a “Fraud” on the Courts”)
- “The decision, first reported by the Washington Post, centered on the Electoral Count Act, a law that governs the certification of a presidential contest and was part of the defendants’ claims they were acting lawfully.”…
“In all, 18 Republicans were charged with forgery, fraud and conspiracy. The defendants consist of 11 Republicans who submitted a document falsely claiming Trump won Arizona, two former Trump aides and five lawyers connected to the former president, including Rudy Giuliani.”
(“Arizona prosecutors ordered to send fake elector case back to grand jury” – May 19, 2025, AP By JACQUES BILLEAUD)- “
This is elections, this is the backbone of democracy, and all of you
who have not said a damn word are complicit in this. It’s too
much. . . .
What you don’t have the ability to do—and you need to step up and
say this—is stop inspiring people to commit potential acts of violence.
Someone’s going to get hurt. Someone’s going to get shot.
Someone’s going to get killed. “ – sworn testimony
The stark warning was entirely appropriate, and prescient. In addition to the examples Sterling identified, President Trump and his team were also fixated on Georgia election workers Ruby Freeman and Wandrea “Shaye” Moss. He and Giuliani mentioned Freeman repeatedly in meetings with State legislators, at public rallies, and in the January 2nd call with Raffensperger. Referring to a video clip, Giuliani even accused Freeman and Moss of trading USB drives to affect votes “as if they [were] vials of heroin orcocaine.” This was completely bogus: it was not a USB drive; it was a ginger mint.”
(CPO J6 REPORT pp.45)
- “At an evidentiary hearing this week, Mr Wade's former divorce lawyer was asked about texts he had sent to another attorney, in which he said Mr Wade and Ms Willis' relationship "absolutely" started before she hired him, and that the pair were "arrogant".”
(BBC March 6, 2024 “Fani Willis: How Georgia prosecutor's affair affects a Trump Trial”)
- “The Trump administration will direct US federal agencies to review Harvard University's grants to potentially end or redistribute funding, as part of the White House's escalating battle with America's oldest university.
The Government Services Administration (GSA) plans to circulate a letter to agencies asking them to identify whether Harvard contracts could be "cancelled or redirected elsewhere", a senior White House official said.
The administration estimates about 30 contracts, collectively worth $100m (£74m), could be reviewed. It already had frozen $2.65bn in federal grants and tried to revoke Harvard's ability to enrol international students.
Harvard University did not immediately comment.”
(BBC News, May 28, 2025 “Trump administration seeks to pull estimated $100m in Harvard funding” - Kayla Epstein and Bernd Debusmann)
- “By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.) (IEEPA), the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1601 et seq.) (NEA), section 212(f) of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (8 U.S.C. 1182(f)), and section 301 of title 3, United States Code,
I, DONALD J. TRUMP, President of the United States of America, find that the International Criminal Court (ICC), as established by the Rome Statute, has engaged in illegitimate and baseless actions targeting America and our close ally Israel. The ICC has, without a legitimate basis, asserted jurisdiction over and opened preliminary investigations concerning personnel of the United States and certain of its allies, including Israel, and has further abused its power by issuing baseless arrest warrants targeting Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Former Minister of Defense Yoav Gallant. The ICC has no jurisdiction over the United States or Israel, as neither country is party to the Rome Statute or a member of the ICC.”
(“IMPOSING SANCTIONS ON THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT” on the white house gov site Feb 10.)
- Now current United States Deputy Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Dan Bongino 5/30/2024 via Twitter:
- President of the United States, on Memorial day 5/26/2025 (via Truth Social)
-
- The President of the United States weighs in on his $400M gift from QATAR, yes, he keeps it when he leaves office, via his social network, Truth Social, May 2025
- Plane gifted to Trump by Qatar
(image source Daily Mail.com, By CHRIS MELORE, ASSISTANT SCIENCE EDITOR FOR DAILYMAIL.COM)
- “More than 60 federal judges who ruled against Trump's policies have been subjected to online abuse, doxxing, and physical threats, a Reuters investigation revealed. Some judges and their families have also received threatening messages and even bomb threats, prompting increased security measures.”
( Newsweek.com “Donald Trump Rails Against Judges Despite Justice Jackson's New Warning” Published May 03, 2025 at 6:19 AM EDT)
- “The guest list was private, but actually we obtained a copy of the guest list, and we know who was at the dinner and we have identified many of them and communicated with many of them.
And they come from all over the world, but particularly from Asia, from China, from Singapore, from Korea. Many of them are major crypto players from Asia, and they are seeking in some cases to enter the United States marketplace. And they're seeking a regulatory blessing from the Trump administration to begin to seek profits here in the United States.”..
“The dinner held at his Northern Virginia golf club was organized to boost sales of his cryptocurrency coin launched just days before the inauguration. The top 220 buyers of the meme coin were extended invitations. A guest at the dinner provided a video of the president to The New York Times.”
(PBS Newshour - “Private event with crypto customers fuels accusations of Trump profiting off presidency” May 23, 2025)
- Paul Walczak’s pardon application cited his mother’s support for the president, including raising millions of dollars and a connection to a plot to publicize a Biden family diary.
(NYTimes “Trump Pardoned Tax Cheat After Mother Attended $1 Million Dinner”, May 27, 2025)
Dated: 5/28/2025
AFFIDAVIT TO ACCURACY OF SOURCING
I have used all reasonable due diligence to authenticate cited sources and content.
Respectfully submitted under oath and penalty of perjury,
/s/ Joe Alter
Joe Alter, Pro Se Plaintiff
[1] Volume 2 of the report continues to be withheld by the Trump administration, despite cases being dismissed.
So far as I have read NOTHING official has been done about the election irregularities. The election was stolen by orange menace with the help of musk and others who messed with the machines, to say nothing of tossing out tons of legitimate ballots
And he should have been prosecuted during the 4 years after that. He was allowed to delay after delay after delay until NOTHING was done and he wasn't prevented from running again and rigging the system for himself.